Showing posts with label Buddha. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Buddha. Show all posts

Monday, September 15, 2014

The Lists of 8: Meditations, Paths, Pollutions

The Lists of 8: Meditations, Paths, Pollutions 

[source: learningmeditation]












Paul's 8 Things To Meditate On:

whatever is

True
Noble
Right
Pure
Lovable
Attractive
Morally Excellent
Worthy of Praise



The Buddha's 8-Fold Path:
















8 Common Thought Pollutions:

According to ancient teachings, the most common thought pollutions are:

Anger
Lust
Jealousy
Envy
Greed
Selfishness
Carelessness
Arrogance

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

The Buddha's 'Flower sermon' (Transmission of Zen)

'The Buddha stood beside a lake on Mount Grdhakuta and prepared to give a sermon to his disciples who were gathering there to hear him speak. As the Buddha waited for his students to settle down, he noticed a golden lotus blooming in the muddy water nearby. He pulled the plant out of the water - flower, long stem, and root. Then he held it up high for all his students to see.
For a long time he stood there, saying nothing, just holding up the lotus and looking into the blank faces of his audience. Suddenly his disciple, Mahakashyapa, smiled. He understood! What did Mahakashyapa understand? Everybody wants to know. For centuries everybody's been asking, "What message did the Buddha give to Mahakashyapa?"'

When Mahakashyapa smiled, what was he smiling at? There have been many suggestions, but I think we can reject all the figurative, allegorical, speculative and fanciful ones like 'Buddha trinity', representation of the Chakras etc. If we think of the flower, we can see that it is perfect, it is a real flower. It didn't become a perfect flower through thinking about it or planning to be a flower; it didn't dream of becoming a flower; it didn't study hard to become a flower. It didn't chant or pray to become a flower. Becoming a flower was its essential nature; it flowered because it was a flower. Maybe you are thinking, 'oh, that's no big deal, it was just a flower.' But that is a big deal. It was just a flower. For, you know, in Zen, that small word "just" is a big word.

I don't know if you have ever been to Kruger Park, in South Africa. Kruger Park is as big as Belgium-- a park full of animals, not people. Most tourists who go there go there looking for the 'Big Five': elephants, lions, and so on. And they can see them,they can find them. But the first animals they will see there are usually these antelope they call impala or maybe the wild pigs known as warthogs. And usually, most tourists just drive straight past the antelopes and pigs, searching for the Big Five. You know, those impalas and warthogs are beautiful creatures, and they are perfect. But to tourists they are just impalas and just warthogs, so they don't stop and look at them. Their heads are full of the Big Five.

The Buddha held up a flower. That was his sermon, his wordless sermon. And Mahakashyapa looked; and Mahakashyapa understood. Because the flower was true to its essential nature, it was beautiful and perfect. It had real beauty and perfection-- the beauty and perfection that can't be written about or spoken of but the beauty of perfection that arises directly and spontaneously from truth.
What the Buddha was revealing was the flower's truth, the flower's essential nature, what we might call its 'buddha nature', if you like. Words can't reveal it or express it, such truth has to be perceived intuitively. And Mahakashyapa perceived this, and so he smiled. This was Zen's beginning, this was Zen's moment, its epiphany. And whenever we behold that smile and recognise it for ourselves, it becomes our smile too and so the transmission continues even as the world continues to turn.

Monday, August 2, 2010

The Zen Smile!

The stupid person says, 'I know'; the intelligent person comes to know that 'I don't know.' But there is a transcendence of both when only silence prevails. [Osho, Ah This!, page 14]

Truly, gaining a University degree is only the beginning of knowing that you know almost nothing--it is not the end of learning but rather perhaps the start of the journey to wisdom. As a university-trained educator myself, I like to remember this and like to remind my students too. The Osho quote above reminds me of it, and it also reminds me of stories. It reminds me of course of the famous 'over-full teacup' story; and it reminds me too of the story of the origin of Zen, which is one of my very favourite stories:

It is told that Zen began with a smile. The Buddha was sitting with his disciples when a rich man, an important, influential man, asked him to explain Dharma. The Buddha had learned that Dharma-- ultimate truth or meaning-- can't ultimately be explained, for it is beyond words, it is beyond the mind, it simply is; Dharma can only be lived and, in the living, recognised. That is what is meant by satori, it is a breakthrough, it is a moment when the scales fall off the eyes, a moment of recognition; and so the Buddha simply held up a flower, only a flower; otherwise he remained silent. At that very moment, one of the Buddha's disciples, Mahakashyap, recognised; he understood; he smiled. And that smile was the beginning of Zen. It was and still is that smile-- not teaching, not rules, not a specific practice, not even zazen-- that was passed from Patriarch to Patriarch, from Master to disciple, from person to person. Zen is the transmission of a smile. And that's why laughter is always at the heart of Zen.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Thomas is Tantric, not Gnostic

As a scholar of ancient texts, it is my belief that the Coptic Gospel of Thomas-- banned by the church for political and gender-prejudiced reasons-- is prior to the gospels that we have in our New Testaments. There have been some convincing arguments proposed towards this thesis. Furthermore, it seems clear that Thomas (and John) represent the testimony most closely of Jesus' closest disciple, the first disciple to greet the resurrected Jesus, Mary of Magdala. Far from being a prostitute or a fallen woman, she was an enlightened disciple.(Download this very interesting essay)


The Gospel of Thomas has many characteristics that set it apart from the familiar gospels: there is no narrative; Mary plays an active role in it; many sayings of Jesus read like sayings of the Buddha; the sayings familiar from the NT gospels appear in an earlier form; and-- I am convinced of this-- there are traces of Tantrism in it.

However, I can't find gnosticism. I suspect the early church fathers and leaders gave the gospel the tag of gnostic simply so they could suppress it.